Search for: "State v. Koontz"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 7:15 am
” Koontz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
In the case of Piedmont v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:02 am
In the case of Piedmont v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Scalia also joined majority opinions written by other justices in several other decisions strengthening protection for property rights by expanding the range of regulations that qualify as takings, culminating in Koontz v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:32 am
" ACLU brief in Koontz v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:07 pm
Also last year, the Court said in Koontz v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:34 am
City of West Hollywood 16-1137 Issue: Whether a legislatively mandated permit condition is subject to scrutiny under the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as set out in Koontz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:40 am
That question may get more play in the case the Court agreed last week to review, Koontz v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 12:33 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:04 am
” In an op-ed for The Daytona Beach News-Journal, Christina Martin discusses the aftermath of the Court’s decision in the property rights case Koontz v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:52 am
" Koontz, J., in George Mason University v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” (Koontz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” (Koontz v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm
Update: You can read here about Koontz v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm
(See also Daniel Koontz, Hostile Public Accommodations Laws and the First Amendment, 3 NYU J. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am
United States Dep't of Agriculture, 673 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
” Subsequently, Justice Scalia joined the 5-4 majority in Koontz v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
” Subsequently, Justice Scalia joined the 5-4 majority in Koontz v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 4:59 pm
You can read about the Takings law review article that Luke Wake and Jarod Bona published about Koontz v. [read post]
