Search for: "State v. Kramer" Results 61 - 80 of 425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
They state it is “unacceptable to violate fundamental human and consumer rights in an attempt at serving more relevant ads. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Kramer, 63 AD3d 723 quoting Klein v Gutman, 12 AD3d 417, 418, 784 NYS2d 581 [2004] [citations omitted]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Kraft Independent Contractor Relationship Between Sender and Advertiser Dooms Spam Claims – Kramer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice and the defendants were entitled to dismissal of that cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d at 909; Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d at 728). [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:00 pm by Joel A. Webber
Consider this from Liz Kramer, partner at Stinson Leonard Street: “I would understand if not every state supreme court got the memo from last year’s [U.S. [read post]