Search for: "State v. Labella"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
” Labella, 15 M.J. at 229 (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 9:44 pm
” Labella, 15 M.J. at 229 (quoting United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm
App. 4 Cir.2001); State v. [read post]
