Search for: "State v. Lambe" Results 41 - 60 of 349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2020, 1:58 pm by Mark Tushnet
The same goes for review of state and local legislation; there you have to talk about the possibility of congressional legislation to preempt bad stuff – freed of the constraint of City of Boerne v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
[Whereas in the Katy Perry case, for example, the crux of the similarity was a descending minor mode 8 figure ostinato, also found in Bach’s Violin Sonata in F Minor, Hammerstien’s Ol Man River, and even, according to the defence, Mary Had A Little Lamb.] [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Given the continuous nature of Breslin's assignment, the light-duty standard set forth in 2 NYCRR 364.3 (b) was properly applied to petitioners' application for disability retirement benefits (see Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Vicks v Hevesi, 45 AD3d at 1038; see also Matter of Lamb v DiNapoli, 128 AD3d at 1321). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
When the IRS happens upon the money trail, and a top prosecutor leans on him to turn state’s evidence and finger some of the corrupt justices, Robbie calls on George Mason, veteran Kindle County lawyer, to represent him and win the best deal he can. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
Top picture by CyberGhostics and is taken from Charles and Mary Lamb, Tales from Shakespeare (1901). [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm by Patricia Salkin
Committee of Neighbors Directly Impacted by Lamb Application v District of Columbia Board of Adjustment, 2019 WL 5617815 (DC CA 10/31/2019)   [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Rector and Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819 (1995); Lamb's Chapel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]