Search for: "State v. Lang"
Results 1 - 20
of 651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2024, 3:16 am
Time will tell if a referral will eventually be made in one of the next FRAND cases dealt with by the UPC (or a national court in an EU member state). (*) Cases n. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 8:09 am
A decision by the German court in VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 8:16 pm
The article’s focus lies on the question of whether or not age assessment procedures carried out in one member state of the EU must be recognised by other member states. [read post]
29 Nov 2024, 3:30 am
Which country most recently ratified the UPC, becoming the 18th member state to do so? [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
UPC 252/2023 NanoString v Harvard ACT_551180/2023 (UPC_CFI_252/2023) The UPC’s Munich Central Division has recently issued its decision revoking Harvard’s EP 2794928 B1 (“the Patent”) in DE, NL, and FR, with other EPO member states likely excluded from the decision on commercial grounds having lapsed during opposition proceedings in 2019. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 11:40 am
For example, the above quoted Section from Chapter H-V 2.7 cannot be found in the Guidelines of 2009 or of 2013. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 2:30 am
., (together, BioNTech/Pfizer) v CureVac SE. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 3:12 am
Yet, in another recent (and still pending) case before the state court of Rio de Janeiro, i.e. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 8:02 am
In 2014, the same Court had itself revoked certain claims relating to particular dosages for administering raloxifene, on the grounds that they were excluded from patentability (Paris Court of Appeal, 12 March 2014, Eli Lilly and company et al. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 2:15 am
This follows a similar decision by the same Local Division in Dyson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 8:45 am
Strict Scrutiny Compelling State Interest The court says that Utah hasn’t shown a compelling state interest. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 12:39 pm
A notable example is the leading Johnson & Johnson v Scitech, in which the São Paulo State Court granted permanent injunction, material and moral damages for the infringement of surgical stapler IP rights. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 1:56 am
In Abbott’s application, it had stated: “The Patent is valid and in force in the Contracting Member States of Germany, France, The Netherlands and also Ireland. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Axen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 4:42 am
“Although the facts pleaded are presumed to be true and are to be accorded every favorable inference, bare legal conclusions as well as factual claims flatly contradicted by the record are not entitled to any such consideration” (Garendean Realty Owner, LLC v Lang, 175 AD3d 653, 653 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 1:30 am
On 12 July 2024 the English Court of Appeal gave its second FRAND determination judgment, in the context of an appeal and cross-appeal of Mellor J’s first instance decision in IDC v Lenovo. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
On 19 July 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Comptroller – General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks v Emotional Perception AI Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 825 following a hearing on 14-15 May 2024. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 1:14 am
It seems fair enough to state that there is a bias in favour of the patentee before the Opposition Division. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:17 am
In the second case, Panasonic v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The Court of Appeal was clear, in the earlier case of Vestel v Access Advance [2021] EWCA Civ 440, that it is impermissible under English law to bring a free-standing claim for declaratory relief in relation to a FRAND licence. [read post]
