Search for: "State v. Langley"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2024, 11:04 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
‘The Lost King’ was found by HHJ Lewis to bear the meaning that (i) the claimant knowingly misrepresented facts to the media and the public about the University’s role in finding Richard III’s remains and marginalising Langley’s role; and (ii) the claimant was “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising” towards Ms Langley in relation to the project. 5RB summarised the ruling. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
Facebook v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
Without representation from an attorney, Granier filed his own petition for review from the state prison in Angola, Louisiana, arguing, in Granier v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
City of Naperville, Illinois, Langley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:29 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Judge Langley found every witness called by the State to be credible, and every witness called by Mr. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Judge Langley found every witness called by the State to be credible, and every witness called by Mr. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (1993), on the standards for expert testimony, with 24 departing states, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
The case, Langley v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:21 am
State of Georgia (1972). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
” This allegedly caused historic posts to be bylined as “Tito and Tita Langley” rather than “La Baguette. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
The FTT dismissed that application on the basis that i) forfeiture was not the only purpose for an application for determination of breach of lease, and ii) the FTT did not have jurisdiction to determine whether waiver had taken place (distinguishing Swanston Grange (Luton) Management Ltd v Langley-Essen (2008) L & TR 20 and Stemp v Ladbroke Gardens Management Ltd (2018) UKUT 375 (LC)). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
The FTT dismissed that application on the basis that i) forfeiture was not the only purpose for an application for determination of breach of lease, and ii) the FTT did not have jurisdiction to determine whether waiver had taken place (distinguishing Swanston Grange (Luton) Management Ltd v Langley-Essen (2008) L & TR 20 and Stemp v Ladbroke Gardens Management Ltd (2018) UKUT 375 (LC)). [read post]
