Search for: "State v. Langley"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Judge Langley found every witness called by the State to be credible, and every witness called by Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:40 pm
In Chan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
” Langley v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
Langley of the 85th District Court. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:03 am
’ United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:41 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 12:58 pm
In today’s case (Mackinnon v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
‘The Lost King’ was found by HHJ Lewis to bear the meaning that (i) the claimant knowingly misrepresented facts to the media and the public about the University’s role in finding Richard III’s remains and marginalising Langley’s role; and (ii) the claimant was “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising” towards Ms Langley in relation to the project. 5RB summarised the ruling. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main heard before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it was lawful for an upper age limit of 30 to be applied by the Federal state of Hesse in Germany on recruiting firemen. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 6:54 pm
” CCA overturned Bauder and stated the proper rule under the Texas Constitution is the rule articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Oregon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:51 pm
Kyllo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 am
Because of time constraints – one can do only so much in a three-credit course – I do not invest classroom time in the exploration of section 280A(d)(3), which provides that a taxpayer is not treated as using a residence for personal purposes by reason of a rental arrangement for any period if for that period the residence is rented at fair rental to any person for that person’s use of the residence as the person’s principal residence.In a recent case, Langley… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:42 am
In Scory v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
