Search for: "State v. Langley" Results 41 - 60 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm by Joshua Glazov
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm by Josh Glazov
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm by Joshua Glazov
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am by Michael Scutt
The case of Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt Am Main heard before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) held that it was lawful for an upper age limit of 30 to be applied by the Federal state of Hesse in Germany on recruiting firemen. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 6:54 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
” CCA overturned Bauder and stated the proper rule under the Texas Constitution is the rule articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Oregon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Because of time constraints – one can do only so much in a three-credit course – I do not invest classroom time in the exploration of section 280A(d)(3), which provides that a taxpayer is not treated as using a residence for personal purposes by reason of a rental arrangement for any period if for that period the residence is rented at fair rental to any person for that person’s use of the residence as the person’s principal residence.In a recent case, Langley… [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
The FTT dismissed that application on the basis that i) forfeiture was not the only purpose for an application for determination of breach of lease, and ii) the FTT did not have jurisdiction to determine whether waiver had taken place (distinguishing Swanston Grange (Luton) Management Ltd v Langley-Essen (2008) L & TR 20 and Stemp v Ladbroke Gardens Management Ltd (2018) UKUT 375 (LC)). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by Giles Peaker
The FTT dismissed that application on the basis that i) forfeiture was not the only purpose for an application for determination of breach of lease, and ii) the FTT did not have jurisdiction to determine whether waiver had taken place (distinguishing Swanston Grange (Luton) Management Ltd v Langley-Essen (2008) L & TR 20 and Stemp v Ladbroke Gardens Management Ltd (2018) UKUT 375 (LC)). [read post]