Search for: "State v. Lao"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
A dispute developed, hence the case of the day, Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
We reported on Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
We reported on Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:04 pm
Unsurprisingly, and with a concise ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City cut short the reviews of an arbitral award the government of Laos sought to challenge in the matter Thai-Lao Lignite v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:00 am
In so holding, the court discussed Lao v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 7:53 am
Lao v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 5:53 am
State succession - a particularly thorny question undoubtedly belonging to the core of public international law - has so far not prompted much debate, but recent decisions in cases such as Sanum v Laos and World Wide Minerals v Kazakhstan is likely to change this. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co., et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 4:48 am
Per Lao v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
Alex Robbins, one of the authors (along with Lynda Lao) of The Effect of Presumptions: An Empirical Examination of Inter-Circuit Sentencing Disparities After United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:24 am
The lesson of Shaofeng Yang v Lao Ma Spicy Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 9:15 pm
Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic [2016] SGCA 57) V. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Philip Devenish & Odysseas G Repousis, CEAC v Montenegro: When does an investor have a ‘seat’ in its home state? [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
The article by Alex Robbins and Lynda Lao is entitled "The Effect of Presumptions: An Empirical Examination of Inter-Circuit Sentencing Disparities After United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 4:25 pm
"The report was sent to Congress as required by Sec. 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998.UPDATE: The remarks of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the remarks and lengthy Q&A of Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom John V. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:21 am
Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Holdings Inc and Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: The Adoption by International Tribunals of a Substantive/Transactional Approach to Res Judicata—A New Paradigm in International Dispute Resolution? [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:50 am
Serrano cites to a recent district court opinion, Lao v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 10:22 pm
In Sanum v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:03 pm
The board of Legal Aid Ontario (LAO) (called “the Corporation” under the 2020 Act) has the authority under section 46 of the 2020 Act to make rules governing the provision of legal aid. [read post]
