Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 201 - 220
of 155,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2025, 2:24 pm
From Moshoures v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 12:47 pm
State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 12:43 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 12:27 pm
From Copeland v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The notion that the federal constitution confers on parents a right to greater legal control over children's rights than a state wishes to give them first appeared in the Supreme Court's 1923 decision Meyer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 10:24 am
But in Milliken v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 9:17 am
Criminal law — Forgery — Motion to suppress Appellant, Adam Heath, was a passenger in a car pulled over by the Berlin Police Department as part of a check fraud […] [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:55 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:06 am
When it comes to medical marijuana in the workplace, state laws are all over the map. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:01 am
Kentucky's RFRA, codified at Kentucky Revised Statutes § 446.350, is a state law. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
Section 2258A is a reporting requirement, not a monitoring requirement: the statute clearly states that providers do not have to search their services for CSAM. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:33 am
Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 7:02 am
In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 6:38 am
Because the district court had dismissed the state-law unfair competition claims solely due to the dismissal of the federal claims, the appellate court reinstated them as well (Cardinal Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 6:15 am
" A second post focusing on Finland is also available.From the EU-Belarus Border to Strasbourg: The Cases on ‘Migrant Instrumentalisation’ Before the ECtHR (Verfassungsblog, March 2025) [text]Monitoring migrants’ human rights at the EU borders: EU law v the UN OPCAT? [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am
As noted by constitutional law scholar Louis Fisher in a legal analysis written for the Law Library of Congress, the Egan Court appeared to deliberately limit its deference to the Executive by explicitly stating, “unless Congress specifically has provided otherwise. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 3:00 am
Jurisdiction Beyond Our Borders: United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 1:59 am
The 510(k) Process and Potential Patent Infringement Implications The 510(k) pathway is the most common pathway for medical devices to achieve market clearance in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 11:00 pm
” Nat'l Ass'n of Diversity Officers in Higher Educ. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 10:00 pm
It also concluded that “humane euthanasia” was “the most appropriate remedy” under the circumstances and affirmed the outcome in all respects.I don’t know about you, but I’m certainly dog-tired of that.# # #DECISIONThe People of the State of New York v. [read post]
