Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 301 - 320 of 156,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2025, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
Consent in Dred Scott Written by a slaveholder and joined by five other slaveholders, Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services [DCA] denied Petitioners' FOIL requests for records pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law §§84-90, seeking "[a] list containing the name, race, gender, current salary, current job title, city start date, salary on city start date, [and] title start date, of all employees of" several City agencies over a period of 10 years. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services [DCA] denied Petitioners' FOIL requests for records pursuant to New York State's Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law §§84-90, seeking "[a] list containing the name, race, gender, current salary, current job title, city start date, salary on city start date, [and] title start date, of all employees of" several City agencies over a period of 10 years. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Evidence recognized under the law. must be in admissible form and properly authenticated (Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:40 am by Drew M. Capuder
But under federal and state wage laws, these small adjustments can add up fast—and lead to serious legal exposure. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 3:00 am by Will Yeatman
The “no set of circumstances” test originated in a 1987 case, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 1:23 am by David Pocklington
Cite this article as: David Pocklington, "“Net zero”, church heating, and the consistory courts – V" in Law & Religion UK, 4 April 2025, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2025/04/04/net-zero-church-heating-and-the-consistory-courts-v/ [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
United States, a 1935 case upholding for-cause removal protections for independent agencies, and Seila Law v. [read post]