Search for: "State v. Lawson" Results 101 - 120 of 384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2016, 5:28 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
A Virginia court has issued a temporary injunction ordering VCU Medical Center to continue life-sustaining medical treatment for Miranda Grace Lawson. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Lawrence Solum
(The other same-sex marriage case was United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:47 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Conspiracy to distribute marijuana Mahdi Lawson, appellant, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County of various offenses arising out of his efforts to have drugs delivered into jail while he was incarcerated. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 5:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
”  Both Barnett and Whittington build their theories on a foundation of “original public meaning,” but they extend the moves made by Scalia and Lawson in a variety of interesting ways. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Lawson Software, Inc., No. 15-639 (what happens with a finally-determined permanent injunction after PTO cancels the patent claim?) [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:14 am
 That provision states that "the Court of Appeal will seek to take into account the fact that a case was in the Shorter Trials Scheme... [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 8:37 am by Lawrence Solum
This Article accordingly criticizes the Supreme Court’s plurality opinion in Kerry v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 11:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]