Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 221 - 240 of 421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
  Expenses of leisure, extracurricular and enrichment activities are encompassed within the basic child support award. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She testified that she uses the Cadillac to commute to work and for leisure. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 4:15 am by Ben
The linked cases of C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and Others and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd where the CJEU held that copyright owners must authorise any communication to the public and such authorisation was required where a person makes the protected work "accessible to a new public", and then finally the TVCatchup case C‑607/11 ITV v… [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:19 am by Graeme Hall
FA (Iraq) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant): Supreme Court refers humanitarian protection appeal rights question to Court of Justice of European Union. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 4:39 am by David J. DePaolo
Though he didn't attend the meeting he was still paid for the two hours that the meeting would have taken because his former supervisor considered that he would not have been in the motorcycle accident but for the meeting.The workers' compensation judge, the Appeals Board and the 5th District all found compensability.In Kansas, the state Supreme Court sent a case back to the fact finding courts to determine if an employee who was injured in a go-kart accident was in the course and scope of… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
See In re Mullarkey, 536 F.3d at 230 (describing the doctrine as applicable where a plaintiff alleges that the mortgagee breached the parties' underlying agreement) (discussing Leisure Technology-Northeast, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:00 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
See In re Mullarkey, 536 F.3d at 230 (describing the doctrine as applicable where a plaintiff alleges that the mortgagee breached the parties' underlying agreement) (discussing Leisure Technology-Northeast, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  The Court in its decision stated that the issue of whether the plaintiff was following too closely to the rider in front of her was an issue of comparative fault, which should be decided by a trier of fact. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  The Court in its decision stated that the issue of whether the plaintiff was following too closely to the rider in front of her was an issue of comparative fault, which should be decided by a trier of fact. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:30 am by Thomas Swartz
  The Court in its decision stated that the issue of whether the plaintiff was following too closely to the rider in front of her was an issue of comparative fault, which should be decided by a trier of fact. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
  The controlling statutory law is N.J.S.A. 9:2-2 and the precedential case in the state of NJ is Baures v. [read post]