Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 41 - 60 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2011, 8:56 pm by Pam Brannon
If you compare that with information from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, like Felony Sentences in State Courts, you can see some of the differences. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:58 pm
    But Riverside also has a Federal Court outpost, and that's where they've been trying the Mattel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:24 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Wilkinson, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2733 (11 December 2009) Josephs, R v [2009] EWCA Crim 2800 (17 December 2009) Sheppard & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 65 (29 January 2010) C & Anor, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 72 (29 January 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Akzo Nobel UK Ltd v Arista Tubes Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 28 (29 January 2010) Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Mark Alemo-Herron & 23 Ors [2010] EWCA… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
  This test was considered in the House of Lords in British Coal Corporation v Smith and others [1996] ICR 515. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:27 pm
What one conceives well can be stated with clarity and the words to say it come easily. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Woolley & Anor v Ultimate Products Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1038 (26 July 2012) Westcoast (Holdings) Ltd v Wharf Land Subsidiary (No 1) Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1003 (26 July 2012) Peaktone Ltd v Joddrell [2012] EWCA Civ 1035 (26 July 2012) NHS Leeds v Larner [2012] EWCA Civ 1034 (25 July 2012) YZ (China), R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1022… [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
      [1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC 2629 (Pat)… [read post]