Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 161 - 180 of 324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am by INFORRM
” Lord Sumption, albeit with the benefit of later CJEU decisions in FAPL v QC Leisure and Infopaq II that were not available to Proudman J or the Court of Appeal, has made a clear statement that there is no policy reason why mere watching and listening (as opposed to downloading or printing) should be regarded as an infringement in the online world any more than in the offline world. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Div. 2001) ("romantic relationships are not protected 'recreational activities'"); State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
The initial comment, posted in January 2010, stated, in part:`This is what I would like to consider a public service profile for anyone that is not aware of Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
It's Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul's International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162, of 20 October 2010.   [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Richard Hunt
May 16, 2018) the court rejected a motion to dismiss claiming that pleadings “on information and belief” were not sufficient to state a claim. [read post]