Search for: "State v. Lende"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2011, 2:12 pm
The Directive also provides that Member States may derogate from the exclusive right in respect of public lending, provided that at least authors obtain a remuneration for such lending, and that Member States shall be free to determine this remuneration taking account of their cultural promotion objectives. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:06 am
Fair lending. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:50 pm
Aniel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:30 am
Part V examines the current state of Gift Clause jurisprudence in Arizona. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 5:26 pm
In Cuomo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:03 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:08 pm
In Balderas v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:16 am
The Court also notes that the Member States may lay down additional conditions capable of improving the protection of authors’ rights beyond what is expressly laid down in the directive. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:39 am
Consumer Protection TILA It violates the Truth in Lending Act for a lender to have a borrower sign a postdated certificate stating he did not wish to rescind the loan. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:11 am
Gordon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Here: US Cert Opp Brief Cert petition here. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
Here: Great Plains Brief Dept of Banking Brief [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
In Hively v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:31 pm
In LaSalle Bank NA v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:08 am
Kitson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:51 am
Clearing House Association [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that the National Bank Act (NBA) [12 USC § 484(a) text] and 12 CFR § 7.4000 [text] do not prevent a state from enforcing fair lending laws against national banks. [read post]
8 May 2008, 10:03 am
The case, reported by the Real Estate Section of the Westchester County Bar Association in its private blog is LaSalle Bank NA v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:51 pm
According to a press release, the bill seeks to (i) ensure that a third party doesn’t gain control of a consumer’s account through remotely created checks, (ii) allow consumers to cancel a debit in connection with a small-dollar loan, (iii) require all lenders, including banks, to abide by a state’s rules for small-dollar, payday-like loans they offer customers in the state, (iv) ban lead generators and anonymously registered payday lending… [read post]
