Search for: "State v. Lende" Results 81 - 100 of 2,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2022, 6:31 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The publishers are urging the court to declare that “controlled digital lending is not a defense to copyright infringement” and is unlawful under United States law. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:20 am by Brett Natarelli
The trade group raised four main arguments: the Payday Lending Rule is unconstitutional because the CFPB Director is insulated from being removed by the President (the same issue presented in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:49 am
Today, the Supreme Court decided to permit states to police banks for discrimination in mortgage lending in the teeth of some statutory language that looked pretty preemptive, and a regulation that banned them from trying. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:27 am
Quester of the Center for Responsible Lending and consumer advocate and writer Kathleen E. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:11 am by Docket Navigator
Ultimately, '[g]iven the evolving state of the law, the § 101 analysis . . . is a difficult exercise,' and 'therefore, not an exercise that lends itself to, e.g., shifting fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
The Supreme Court issued its opinion today in Watters v. [read post]
Department of Justice (with the notable exception of enforcement investigations) and other federal and state agencies on fair lending issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision—which held that, under some circumstances, a loan originated by a bank became subject to state usury laws once transferred to a non-bank—implicitly rejected the long-standing doctrine of “valid when made” and once threatened to upend the lending industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision—which held that, under some circumstances, a loan originated by a bank became subject to state usury laws once transferred to a non-bank—implicitly rejected the long-standing doctrine of “valid when made” and once threatened to upend the lending industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision—which held that, under some circumstances, a loan originated by a bank became subject to state usury laws once transferred to a non-bank—implicitly rejected the long-standing doctrine of “valid when made” and once threatened to upend the lending industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision—which held that, under some circumstances, a loan originated by a bank became subject to state usury laws once transferred to a non-bank—implicitly rejected the long-standing doctrine of “valid when made” and once threatened to upend the lending industry. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 10:00 pm
The decision—which held that, under some circumstances, a loan originated by a bank became subject to state usury laws once transferred to a non-bank—implicitly rejected the long-standing doctrine of “valid when made” and once threatened to upend the lending industry. [read post]