Search for: "State v. Levy"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 4:36 pm
Levi (Out of […] The post Supreme Court issues its ruling in Bernard v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:20 am
The AG concluded that Member States may exclude reproduction devices from payment of levies when an objective justification exists. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 10:23 am
The case is ETC Marketing, Ltd. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 10:23 am
The case is ETC Marketing, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:36 am
Remember Case C-462/09 Thiuskopie v Opus?]. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:03 am
See, e.g., Ray v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:05 pm
In West v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:07 am
Earlier this week, the state of Washington finally took its first step to implement the school funding remedy first mandated in McCleary v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Heiser involves the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s limitations on attachment or levy of execution on the assets of foreign states or their instrumentalities. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 8:30 am
No account taken of a private copying levy already paid in another Member State The Court’s answer is that the obligation to pay a levy such as the blank cassette levy may not be excluded by reason of the fact that a comparable levy has already been paid in another Member State. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
" Compare Levi Strauss v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:20 am
• Leave a comment on ECJ: Private copying levies II-the Stichting de Thuiskopie v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
Our conclusion that the contested statements were nontestimonial under Davis compels us to reject the challenges levied by Rodriguez and Cruz under Bruton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:00 am
Here is the abstract: In Polar Tankers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:47 am
In Bacchus Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:18 pm
Carnahan that a ballot proposition designed to repeal state law authorizing Kansas City to levy an earnings tax did not violate the state constitution. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm
” Vanity responded to the letter by filing for declaratory relief against the denim giant stating that the “V” design on the back of its jeans is “visually distinctive” from Levi’s jeans and that “Levi Strauss does not have the right to prevent Vanity from using a stylized version of the letter ‘V’ in connection with its pocket designs. [read post]
