Search for: "State v. Lien" Results 41 - 60 of 2,442
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code § 5412, was not presented at trial can be found in the Noteworthy Panel Decision (NPD) of Raymond Craig Penrose v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Ingo Venzke
Member States and public bodies like federal states or municipalities often impose various restrictions on, for example, pharmaceuticals, adult content, gambling, alcohol, weapons, among others. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:09 pm by The White Law Group
He reportedly mentioned in his BrokerCheck profile comment that the firm plans to defend the claims, asserting they lack merit and evidence, stating that the investments were aligned with the stated objectives, risk tolerance, and time horizon. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The first is how law firms may charge clients in a charging lien or a fee claim for fixed monthly electronic research costs, the second is an application of account stated, and the third is an analysis of a Judiciary Law 487 counterclaim. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:00 am by Bryan West
Parties cannot be added to a lien action by way of counterclaim, the Court bluntly stated. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothman v Sandra Radna, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 33670(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 152678/2023Judge: Lynn R. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Under the UCC, as a general rule, all types of goods held on consignment (not just art) are subject to claims of the consignee-dealer’s creditors while in the consignee’s possession unless the consignor has complied with the UCC’s requirements of publicly filing a notice stating that the consignor holds a security interest in the consigned work of art. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[SWAT takings, retaliatory liens, and a Spam confiscation.] [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:32 am by John R. Byrne
The en banc Court examined a federal statute that criminalizes the filing of retaliatory liens against "any officer or employee of the United States. [read post]