Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 41 - 60 of 705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
   The leading case in the UK post pregabalin is Eli Lilly v Genentech [2019] EWHC 387, where Arnold J also found that the plausibility threshold was not met.The key take home message is that plausibility is alive and well in the UK. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am by Camilla Hrdy
" (quoting Lilly v Novopharm / Olanzapine) Starting around 2005, until the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca, Canadian courts applied the Promise Doctrine in the pharmaceutical context to invalidate patents. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 10:59 am by Camilla Hrdy
" (quoting Lilly v Novopharm / Olanzapine) Starting around 2005, until the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in AstraZeneca, Canadian courts applied the Promise Doctrine in the pharmaceutical context to invalidate patents. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:00 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Eli Lilly claims that it is the assignee of the ‘209 patent, a method patent which was upheld as valid by the Federal Circuit in, Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:22 am
Lilly is the exclusive licensee of the patent.In an attempt to clear the market for their own tadalafil generic, Actavis brought revocation proceedings against the ICOS/Lilly patent. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
  The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:47 am
This was in view of Genentech's parallel applications for SPCs based on the patent filed in other EU member states. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
 Finally, there was an analysis of the recent decision of the District Court of The Hague that the Dutch part of Eli Lilly and Company's patent EP 1 313 508 is valid. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Ever since Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) dragged equivalence into the UK patent infringement system there has been an open question regarding the future of the so-called 'Gillette defence'. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
In many circumstances, she had to make a decision because the law required it but it was not necessarily the best thing for the family.Inevitably there was some discussion about the implications of Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Supreme Court of Canada stated (Free World Trust v. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 9:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly JR (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) was heard on 15 November 2018. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
finding that unregistered design rights are more commonly litigated and have a much higher success rate than registered designs: There's a new IPO report on designs infringement - game-changer or stating the obvious? [read post]