Search for: "State v. Lilly" Results 121 - 140 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2007, 6:20 pm
Biogen IDEC, decided just a month after Merck in the District of Maryland, the district court interpreted Merck's holding in the broadest possible manner, dismissing Classen's claims against Biogen IDEC ("Biogen") and GlaxoSmithKline ("GSK") when the defendants successfully argued that their allegedly infringing acts of research tool use fell within the safe harbor provision of 271(e)(1) as construed in Lilly and Merck. n89footnote 89 states: Classen… [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:09 am by Tom
Decided September 10, 2009, Mikula gives full effect to Congress’s intent to overturn the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:24 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Art 57 states that an invention is susceptible of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 12:50 am
Lilly Ledbetter, for example, sued for a decision nearly 20 years hence. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
It is here - the Supreme Court's decision in Eli Lilly v Actavis UK [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:36 am by Russell Cawyer
 You can read the First District Court of Appeals' decision in Prairie View A & M University v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Nathan Yaffe, Transnational Arbitral Res JudicataSilke Noa Kumpf, Equity-Based Discretion and the Anatomy of Damages Assessment in Investment Treaty LawBoris Kasolowsky, Eric Leikin, Eli Lilly v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
THE VOTE - has the decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly improved the law? [read post]