Search for: "State v. Lingle"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2008, 8:09 am
Linda Lingle announced today that she granted pardons to six individuals in 2008, in accordance with the power vested in her by the Hawai‘i State Constitution (Article V, Section 5). [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:40 pm
Maybe this piece in today's Star Advertiser contains a hint.Perhaps his most significant came last month as Lingle was considering her first choice for chief justice.In an 81-page opinion [County of Hawaii v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
Last week, the Hawaii Supreme Court issued an opinion in Hawaii State Teachers Association and United Public Workers, AFCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
Curious about what state judges make? [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:16 am
Here's the abstract:The United States Supreme Court recently clarified in Lingle v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:24 pm
The amendment was spurred by the decision of the state supreme court in Baehr v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
After Lingle v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm
See Allis-Chalmers Corp. v, Lueck, 471 U.S. 202 (1985), In Lingle v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:49 pm
In her state of the state address today, Hawaii Governor Linda Lingle had this to say about the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:20 am
The court recognized prior Hawaii case law (Winslow v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm
On June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 10:21 am
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 556 U.S. 163 (2009), and Lingle v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Lingle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 4:40 pm
The court struggled with what to do with Landgate, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Lingle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:40 pm
We recently wrote about the Indiana Supreme Court’s decision in Arrendale v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm
Ambler Realty Co.; and (2) whether a regulatory restriction on the right to use one's property “must substantially advance a legitimate state interest” to satisfy the substantive requirement of due process, per Lingle, Nectow, and Euclid. [read post]
