Search for: "State v. Link"
Results 361 - 380
of 23,925
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
For links to selected FOIL decision summaries posted by NYPPL click HERE [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
For links to selected FOIL decision summaries posted by NYPPL click HERE [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm
Uriel-Charles discussed the 1960 Supreme Court case Gomillion v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:26 am
In Enerfin Field Services v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The Grand Chamber judgment also refers to the ECtHR’s approach in Delfi AS v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Amar, which is linked here. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:11 pm
The complaint, filed in Mayanna Berrin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:34 am
ShareEach weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 6:53 am
Texas State Board of Pharmacy: The State Board of Pharmacy plays a crucial role in investigating Medicaid fraud related to prescription drugs. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
In Fox v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
The Hardwick class consists of every individual in the state of Ohio with measurable concentrations of certain PFAS chemicals. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm
We’ve missed a few things while I was gone:The judge in the Mata v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 10:36 am
Consumers that are protected under the law are defined as an individual who is a resident of the state of Texas acting only in an individual or household context. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
You can find the ruling at this link. [read post]