Search for: "State v. Little" Results 1 - 20 of 26,624
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Congress has shown little appetite for reform. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm by Kevin
The Florida “crack bear” bill passed, so it’s now a little easier to justify killing a bear in that state. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:53 am by Chris Castle
That lawfare got underway this week when TikTok filed a substantial lawsuit (by the pound) to stop the sale and protect access to the US market, just a little while longer. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]