Search for: "State v. Little"
Results 1 - 20
of 23,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2025, 1:08 pm
Perhaps this is because, at least among legal academics, relatively little interest exists in victims' rights. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 12:51 pm
As Marbury v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
For example, in the now-infamous 2005 case of Kelo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 2:46 pm
Access Copyright and the SOCAN v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
In State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
That was certainly true of Wechsler’s essay, even though it was “merely” the Holmes Lecture at the Harvard School, funded by the Holmes Devise that the Justice left to the United States on his death. [read post]
Opening Remarks by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth at Ukraine Defense Contact Group (As Delivered)
16 Feb 2025, 12:55 pm
") on the one hand, the principle of efficient breach (Lake River Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 8:39 am
We have a strong dissent.The case is Murray v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 3:34 pm
United States and Percoco v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
In Herring v. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 11:26 pm
Reliance on documentary evidence is further reinforced in Manzi v King’s College Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 1882 wherein the court states that clinical records are made in line with professional duties but also for the ongoing care and treatment of a patient. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:01 am
” The operative language of the executive order requires “a 90-day pause in United States foreign development assistance for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:10 am
In Civil Rights Department v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 1:13 pm
In Ames v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 11:47 am
United States, 461 U.S. 574 (1983) (racially discriminatory policies of schools cannot be charitable – Two part test: (1) Is there a public policy against a particular activity? [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
In 2011, in Turner v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
In other words, the tweet doesn’t take direct issue with what Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 2:13 pm
As things stand, there is little except public resistance that prevents normalization of the invocation of section 33. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:30 am
People of the State of California v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 7:24 am
(v) A cost benefit analysis should be carried out: Given the enforcement investigation proposals represent a significant departure from the FCA’s previous approach, it remains the Committee’s firm view that proposed changes of this extent necessitate a robust and detailed analysis of the direct costs to the sector. [read post]