Search for: "State v. Loftis" Results 1 - 20 of 176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Shea Denning
Loftis had no application on Parisi’s facts, said the court, which cited as controlling the state supreme court’s ruling in State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm by Shea Denning
Loftis had no application on Parisi’s facts, said the court, which cited as controlling the state supreme court’s ruling in State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:16 am
I love the rhetorical device — must be a Greek name for it — of heading into something lofty or deep by portraying the reader as someone who's already thinking about it on that level.Volokh explains Greenwood and proceeds to State v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 8:00 pm
Once "bought out," unit is no longer subject to rent stabilizationNew York’s Court of Appeals—the state’s highest court—recently issued a decision that some are calling a “major win. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Moreover, the injunction improperly applied home state law extraterritorially, in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court's decision in International Paper Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
  But you write some opinions addressed to the general public and, perhaps, future generations.Here's unquestionably one of the latter.There's no shortage of lofty expressions in either the majority opinion or the dissent. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:16 am by Benton
I’m very glad education made the bullet list: It’s an area where there is so much discussion about state v. federal control, but it’s cities that make real on-the-ground breakthroughs. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]