Search for: "State v. Lohr" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 1:44 pm
 Thus, although [Lohr] can be read to allow certain state-law causes of actions that parallel federal safety requirements, it does not and cannot stand for the proposition that any violation of the FDCA will support a state-law claim.531 U.S. at 532-33 (Lohr citation omitted) (emphasis original). [read post]
2 Sep 2007, 5:50 pm
" Id. at 1379.Though the Ninth Circuit has not directly addressed this issue post-Lohr, it did address the issue pre- Lohr, in Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm by Bexis
Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) – decided on a motion to dismiss – speculated might have stated such a claim. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:18 am
  Lohr does state that U.S.C. section 360k does not preempt State or local requirements that are “equal to, or substantially identical to, requirements under the act. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
Lohr, a case in which the Supreme Court rejected the preemption of state court claims arguments. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:41 am by Bexis
Because it applied implied preemption, the decision in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 1:00 pm
Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519, 525 (1977) (cases also cited in Lohr). [read post]