Search for: "State v. London" Results 181 - 200 of 3,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2021, 6:29 am by Florence Campbell Jones
”[8] To discuss how this decision may affect your business operations, please contact Anupreet Amole of our London office or your usual Brown Rudnick adviser. ___________ [1] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 (https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2018-0215-judgment.pdf) [2] R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:30 am by Elin Hofverberg
; FALQs: Brexit Referendum; and The UK’s Legal Response to the London Bombings of 7/7. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 pm
Full story: Family Law Week.Damage to children’s mental health caused by Covid crisis demands major increase for children’s mental health servicesChildren's Commissioner publishes fourth annual report on the state of children’s mental health services in England. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
Eduardo Álvarez-Armas is Lecturer in Law at Brunel University London and Affiliated Researcher at the Université Catholique de Louvain. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:15 am by Vassilis Mavrakis
Background The M/V Majesty was carrying 25,000 mt of rice under a voyage charterparty on an amended Synacomex 90 form. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a new paradigm through which to view… [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 10:30 am by Giles Peaker
The High Court reminded itself of the approach to PSED in possession cases as set out in London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Patrick (2020) 1 P & CR 5 (our report here). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 2:19 pm by Bruce Zagaris
Supreme Court decision holding that plaintiffs suing a foreign government under the statutory exception for state-sponsored terrorism can seek punitive damages for terrorism. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
”  However, the facts of the CJEU case cited in support of this proposition, Marinari v Lloyds Bank (1995), concerned a series of events which took place in Manchester, culminating in the claimant’s arrest by the police in England, ver [read post]