Search for: "State v. London" Results 221 - 240 of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2007, 2:12 am
State courts have also taken up the challenge, the biggest development in 2006 being the City of Norwood v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am by Jacco Bomhoff
This is thought to be the first claim brought in the UK for damages based on the cause of action developed by the ECJ in the case of Köbler v Republik Österreich (Case C-224/01).The claim concerned two judgments of the Court of Appeal of 1999 and 2000, in which the Council for the Protection of Rural England, of which the claimant was a trustee of the London branch, had been refused judicial review of decisions by local authorities in London (R. v… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:08 am by traceydennis
Supreme Court Duncombe & Ors v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families [2011] UKSC 14 (29 March 2011) Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13 (29 March 2011) Lumba (WL) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 (23 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Folgate London Market Ltd v Chaucer Insurance Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 328 (31 March 2011) W (Children) [2011] EWCA Civ 345 (30 March 2011) Societe… [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am by Jordan Gold
Reasonable expectations of privacy in voyeurism cases under the Canadian Criminal Code: London’s case of R. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin & Anor v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 989 (15 October 2007) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 968 (10 October 2007) Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970 (10 October 2007) Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (10 October 2007) Charman v Orion… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:44 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Trademark Licensing Co Ltd & Anor v Leofelis SA [2012] EWCA Civ 985 (23 July 2012) Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980 (20 July 2012) O’Cathail v Transport for London [2012] EWCA Civ 1004 (20 July 2012) Michael & Ors v South Wales Police & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012) Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cooke & Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However, the Secretary of State indicated that 16 zones and agglomerations in the UK, including Greater London, could not be realistically met by 1 January 2015, and some could not even be expected to be achieved by 2025. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
This did not extend to a right of access to information held by the State when the State was not willing to provide it. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm by Peter Klose
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by David Canton
Watson, Winkelmann’s legal counsel, stated “the sense of parody employed by Winkelmann within the context of his South Butt undertakings clearly demonstrate a respectful, if not faltering ‘anti-North Face’ posture designed in all respects to distinguish itself from any and all North Face products. [read post]