Search for: "State v. London" Results 261 - 280 of 3,963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
This did not extend to a right of access to information held by the State when the State was not willing to provide it. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:44 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) The Trademark Licensing Co Ltd & Anor v Leofelis SA [2012] EWCA Civ 985 (23 July 2012) Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980 (20 July 2012) O’Cathail v Transport for London [2012] EWCA Civ 1004 (20 July 2012) Michael & Ors v South Wales Police & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 981 (20 July 2012) Konodyba v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2012] EWCA Civ… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cooke & Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
City of New London (2005), which ruled that government can condemn private property and give it to other private owners to promote “economic development,” and Korematsu v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm by Peter Klose
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am by David Canton
Watson, Winkelmann’s legal counsel, stated “the sense of parody employed by Winkelmann within the context of his South Butt undertakings clearly demonstrate a respectful, if not faltering ‘anti-North Face’ posture designed in all respects to distinguish itself from any and all North Face products. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Our thanks for this county court possession and deposit appeal case note to Josephine Henderson of Five Paper Chambers and Dambudzo Tenner of Duncan Lewis Amak Property Investments (London) Ltd v Laura Sonny B01CL657. 15 September 2016, The County Court at Central London This was an appeal of the dismissal of a set aside application following a possession order being made under the accelerated procedure without a hearing. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:12 am
v=T8zQrL3M9q8 As a regional organization, ESYO attracts students from over 75 public and private schools throughout eastern New York State and western New England. [read post]