Search for: "State v. London"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 12:58 am
We have previously reported on the first instance decision of Maher v Groupama Est [2009] EWHC 38 (QB) in which the English Court considered two preliminary issues in proceedings brought by English claimants in London, against the French insurer, Groupama, for damages they incurred in an accident in France, in which the French insured was killed. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
However, he stated there was a “strong public interest in this statutory regime”. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:21 pm
V. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
London Borough of Enfield [2001] 2 AC 550, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson; this terminology was misunderstood by the ECtHR in Osman v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 1:30 am
See Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:07 am
Supreme Court W (Algeria) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 (7 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gedeon Richter Plc v Bayer Pharma AG [2012] EWCA Civ 235 (07 March 2012) Miah & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 261 (07 March 2012) Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260 (07 March 2012) Zieleniewski v Scheyd… [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Justice Myers in Sabey v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 7:00 pm
(Underwriters at Lloyd’s London v NL Industries Inc.)]Now there's no glossing over that! [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 9:30 am
The remarks were dismissed at the time by the Metropolitan police which said “We would not normally dignify such comments with a response, however, on this occasion we think it’s important to state to Londoners that Mr Trump could not be more wrong”. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
The thorny and increasingly important issue of jurisdiction went before the Court of Appeal earlier this month in Bush v Bush [2008] EWCA Civ 865.The Facts: The parties were married in London in April 1988 and went to live in Tanzania in 1991 or 1992. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
London, where the judges will set a rate before you get to enforce an injunction? [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Alea London, Ltd. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Nomanbhoy v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 10:10 am
Supreme Court's infamous decision in Kelo v. [read post]
