Search for: "State v. London" Results 141 - 160 of 2,855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm by David Smith
Qurat-Ul-Ain Zia v Mourtada Central London County Court 09/02/2010 This case in Central London County Court has been reported briefly in Legal Action [but we have had the transcript - NL]. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 3:41 pm
City of New London (2005), which ruled that government can condemn private property and give it to other private owners to promote “economic development,” and Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm by Peter Klose
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Our thanks for this county court possession and deposit appeal case note to Josephine Henderson of Five Paper Chambers and Dambudzo Tenner of Duncan Lewis Amak Property Investments (London) Ltd v Laura Sonny B01CL657. 15 September 2016, The County Court at Central London This was an appeal of the dismissal of a set aside application following a possession order being made under the accelerated procedure without a hearing. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am by Jacco Bomhoff
This is thought to be the first claim brought in the UK for damages based on the cause of action developed by the ECJ in the case of Köbler v Republik Österreich (Case C-224/01).The claim concerned two judgments of the Court of Appeal of 1999 and 2000, in which the Council for the Protection of Rural England, of which the claimant was a trustee of the London branch, had been refused judicial review of decisions by local authorities in London (R. v… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:59 am by David Smith
Goremsandu, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow [2010] EWHC 1873 (Admin) As many of you will know the definition of an HMO for the purposes of Council Tax is totally different from that used in the Housing Act 2004 (and in relation to planning uses classes). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
However, the Secretary of State indicated that 16 zones and agglomerations in the UK, including Greater London, could not be realistically met by 1 January 2015, and some could not even be expected to be achieved by 2025. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
This did not extend to a right of access to information held by the State when the State was not willing to provide it. [read post]