Search for: "State v. Longmore" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by CMS
  The shipowners issued bills of lading which were stated to incorporate the terms of the voyage charterparty. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:22 am by Apostolos Anthimos
The question however remains the same: Are declaratory orders stating that English courts have exclusive jurisdiction and that proceedings in other Member States are in breach of an English exclusive jurisdiction agreement in line with the mutual trust principle? [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2019] EWCA Civ 819. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ)will hand down judgment in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson (heard 3 April 2019). [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 3 April 2019 (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 3 April 2019 (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
  As the the Court themselves stated:"We are conscious that in so deciding we are arriving at a conclusion which is different from that of an experienced patent judge. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am by Dave
  In other words, the question was whether the judgment of Gage LJ in Tetteh v Kingston Upon Thames Royal London Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1775 survived Hotak; ie that it remained correct in asserting that a review decision had to be read as a whole and that there was no reason for the reviewer to go further than stating the test and the overall finding. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
If that is right then the test propounded by Longmore LJ [in Hussain v GMC [2014] EWCA Civ 2246] would impose a higher standard than the test which applies to non-medical endeavours. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
In any event, I agree with Longmore LJ’s analysis of the operation of section 191(2) in Najim. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 7 July 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJ) handed down judgment in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWCA Civ 950. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
 The law on added matter was not disputed, having been recently reviewed by Floyd LJ (with Longmore LJ and Lewison LJ both in agreement) in AP Racing Ltd v Alcon Components Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 40 (reported on by this blog here). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am by Karon Monaghan QC
Lord Justice Longmore reminded us in Rights of Women that, “legal aid is one of the hallmarks of a civilised society”. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]