Search for: "State v. Longmore" Results 41 - 60 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2010, 9:54 pm by Simon Gibbs
” • Referring to this judgment Longmore LJ, in Summit Property Ltd v Pitmans (A Firm) [2001] EWCA Civ 2020, at paragraph 16, approved this view and went further: “In my judgment, it is also no longer necessary for a party to have acted unreasonably or improperly before he can be required to pay the costs of the other party of a particular issue on which he (the first party) has failed. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: R (Evans) v HM Attorney-General, heard 24 and 25 November 2014 (UK Supreme Court) Rufus v Elliott, heard 10 December 2014 (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) OPO v MLA, heard 9 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Rai v Bholowasia heard 19-23, and 26 to… [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am by Marta Requejo
” Related posts:Forum non conveniens, anti-suit injunctions, and concurrent US and Australian copyright proceedings In TS Production LLC v Drew Pictures Pty Ltd [2008]... [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
In any event, I agree with Longmore LJ’s analysis of the operation of section 191(2) in Najim. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:55 am
Without Liffe's knowledge or permission, Pinkava filed patent applications in the United States, where business methods are patentable, and later assigned them to his own company, De Novo. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 3 April 2019 (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) [read post]
17 May 2015, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2015 the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in Murray v Associated Newspapers, [2015] EWCA Civ 488. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Opposition is growing over State Government plans to extend defamation laws. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Focus Graphite Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
His decision was upheld on appeal with both Buxton LJ and Longmore LJ paying tribute to his ‘careful and correct’ judgment and his handling of the case. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 18 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (Longmore, Ryder and Briggs LJJ) allowed the appeal of Mrs Levi in the case of Levi v Bates. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:22 am by Apostolos Anthimos
The question however remains the same: Are declaratory orders stating that English courts have exclusive jurisdiction and that proceedings in other Member States are in breach of an English exclusive jurisdiction agreement in line with the mutual trust principle? [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
In particular, Longmore LJ stated (at [86]) that:'The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private not whether it is true or false. [read post]