Search for: "State v. Lopez"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2023, 10:58 am
The post ULISES LOPEZ v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
Read the opinion The post EDWIN ANTONIO LOPEZ v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:52 pm
The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild has published an informative advisory on the recent decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 6:27 am
Lopez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:09 am
Lopez contends that he did not enter his plea of no contest knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
To do so, the court employed the three-part test developed by the United States Supreme Court in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:23 am
USA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 2:49 am
The Center for Immigration Law and Policy has filed an amicus brief in the US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 11:24 am
In Rubio v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 6:59 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Robbery Appellant, Julio Lisandro Lopez Gomez, was convicted of robbery by a jury in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:12 am
Today the Supreme Court held, 8-1, in Lopez v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 5:55 pm
My thought is that it will look much like United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 6:09 am
(filed Aug. 2, 2021) (Rodgers I) in light of the Court’s decision in Lopez-Villa v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:31 pm
From apnews.myway.com: The Supreme Court on Tuesday in Lopez v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 2:42 am
Carrillo-Lopez that 8 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
In Lopez v Villareal, 2012 WL 458490 (D.Nev.)) [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
Caroline Bettinger-Lopez (Columbia Law School) has posted Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
