Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,014
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
Richmond Newspapers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:14 am
However, Lord Justice Arnold dismissed this stating that while people and documents may no longer be available, the fact that Lidl were still relying on privilege between their trade mark attorneys to not disclose certain information suggested that documentation may still be available. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 8:33 am
There have been quite a few “Halliburton” appeals in the last couple of decades and at least one example in the House of Lords/Supreme Court (Conor v Angiotech [2008]). [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Lord Justice Arnold gave observations on the EBA’s decision in G2/21. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:48 pm
Toth v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:19 am
You can read the Lord Chancellor’s speech here. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
The case of Street v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:10 pm
The trial (Liberty v SSHD) is expected to run for two days at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:50 am
Decision Lord Hamblen delivered the only judgment, with which all the other Lord Justices agreed. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
Surveillance The Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Bill had its second reading in the House of Commons this week, after being introduced in the Lords last November. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
Justice Munby, in agreement with Lord Justice Thorpe’s comments, stated that the rule has a “baleful effect” and that “something should be done to amend rule 3.17 with a view to implementing Lord Justice Thorpe’s wise proposals”. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The final version of the ECCTA, which incorporated Lords amendments, received royal assent on October 26, 2023, but it has yet to come into force. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
On 14 February 2024 there was a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
Nonetheless, Cases like Terre Neuve Sarl v Yewdale Ltd [2020] and Etihad Airways PJSC v Flother [2020] reveal complexities in ascertaining commercial expectations and business efficacy. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 2:52 pm
” Trizzino v. [read post]
