Search for: "State v. Love" Results 1 - 20 of 9,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
“I love our blended family and am grateful to have her in it,” she added.Vance doesn’t care whether children are loved (in this case by three parents). [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm by Lovechilde
"Before I was elected vice-president, before I was elected United States senator, I was elected attorney general of the state of California, and I was a courtroom prosecutor before then. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Moreover, over 50 years after the Supreme Court invalidated miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That may be accurate for people who were alive when those laws were still on the books, but how do such past laws influence young people who were born decades after Loving v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court struck down anti-miscegenation laws in Loving v. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on Solangel Maldonado, The Architecture of Desire: How the Law Shapes Interracial Intimacy and Perpetuates Inequality (New York University Press, 2024).Naomi Cahn When I teach Loving v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Under the law, is it possible to hate the sin but love the sinner? [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm
” The Miranda rights, named after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]