Search for: "State v. Lovell"
Results 1 - 20
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2025, 4:51 am
States that follow the Model Penal Code, for example, require individuals to surrender property to a person acting under a claim of right before using defensive force. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm
Vullo was represented at the Second Circuit oral argument by Will Havemann of Hogan Lovells, and the NRA was represented by Noel Francisco of Jones Day.The post <i>NRA v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 3:43 pm
See Dia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Patricia Trofin (Hogan Lovells), commenting on a recent decision of the EU General Court on the elusive concept of bad faith in trade mark law. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:52 am
Anders attended the United States Naval Academy and was commissioned into the U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 1:52 pm
” Lovell Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Ada Nourell (Hogan Lovells) was on hand and delivered an excellent, prompt report on the evening's events (but you know Kats, they do things in their own time....). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am
Sam Krips from Hogan Lovells was on hand to report on the proceedings. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:01 am
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am
In its offensive German cases (though not in the defensive ones, where OPPO is relying on the same firm as Apple against Ericsson: Hogan Lovells), OPPO is represented by Bardehle Pagenberg's Professor Tilman Mueller-Stoy ("Müller-Stoy" in German).A court in Chongqing, China, has already held a first hearing in the OPPO v. [read post]