Search for: "State v. Lovell" Results 1 - 20 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2025, 4:51 am by Will Baude
  States that follow the Model Penal Code, for example, require individuals to surrender property to a person acting under a claim of right before using defensive force. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 3:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
Vullo was represented at the Second Circuit oral argument by Will Havemann of Hogan Lovells, and the NRA was represented by Noel Francisco of Jones Day.The post <i>NRA v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Patricia Trofin (Hogan Lovells), commenting on a recent decision of the EU General Court on the elusive concept of bad faith in trade mark law. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 9:52 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Anders attended the United States Naval Academy and was commissioned into the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Ada Nourell (Hogan Lovells) was on hand and delivered an excellent, prompt report on the evening's events (but you know Kats, they do things in their own time....). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Sam Krips from Hogan Lovells was on hand to report on the proceedings. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211[a][1], [7]). [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by Tom Smith
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
She was fired because she exercised free speech in an internal meeting on the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 am by Florian Mueller
In its offensive German cases (though not in the defensive ones, where OPPO is relying on the same firm as Apple against Ericsson: Hogan Lovells), OPPO is represented by Bardehle Pagenberg's Professor Tilman Mueller-Stoy ("Müller-Stoy" in German).A court in Chongqing, China, has already held a first hearing in the OPPO v. [read post]