Search for: "State v. Lowe"
Results 221 - 240
of 10,216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2018, 2:29 am
The Court noted that, although the Board of Appeal examined the possibility that the public concerned would establish a link between the marks at issue, it first based its analysis on an incorrect assessment of the similarity of the marks at issue [average, not ‘at most very low’].Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 LV argued that the Board of Appeal could not simply state that it was not bound by previous EUIPO decision-making practice or earlier… [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:25 am
Vereen v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:58 pm
Type “United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:15 am
Rev. 791 (2014) Edward Lowe (J.D. 2015, UConn), Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:14 pm
State of Maryland, led to the creation of the Thornton Commission and a statewide funding formula intended to help children from low-income families who needed ... [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Brownsville Division issued a ruling on August 6 in the case of La Union del Pueblo Entero v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 1:15 pm
The state of patent eligibility in America is shocking. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 7:41 pm
State v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:25 pm
Wainwright and unanimously ruled later that year on March 18 at 372 U.S. 335 that states had the obligation to provide counsel for defendants who are unable to afford an attorney, extending the Constitutional right to counsel in criminal cases to poor and low-income people. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 6:37 am
But the state has no intention of reviewing how it awards tax credits for low income housing. [read post]
13 Aug 2004, 5:58 am
The court's opinion in Aspinall v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
I agree that the Abu Ghayth case is an easy one both normatively and pursuant to the very low bar set for speech-as-material-support by the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 3:09 am
On the point of absence of power, Carnwath stated that there was statutory authority provided by the EU Regulation 81, which was given effect by the European Communities Act 1971, to satisfy the principle in Entick v Carrington that interference by the state with individual property rights cannot be justified by the exercise of prerogative powers, unsupported by specific statutory authority. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:44 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:22 am
Baker, a case challenging Colorado's exclusion of "pervasively sectarian institutions" from its tuition assistance programs for low-income students attending colleges and universities in the state. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:42 am
316 Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
A method for producing nanowires, comprising: exposing at least one nanowire precursor to metal nanoparticles in a nanowire growth solution comprising an organic solvent in a non-supercritical state, whereby the metal nanoparticles act as seed particles for the growth of the nanowires, wherein the nanowires comprise a material selected from the group consisting of (a) Group IV elements, (b) Group II elements other than cadmium, (c) Group VI elements other than tellurium, (d) combinations of… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
On October 10, 2013, Kathryn Rivera filed a motion to dismiss the plenary action for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
