Search for: "State v. Lowe" Results 141 - 160 of 10,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:57 pm by David Horton
 The California Supreme Court (and courts in many other states) have held that class action waivers can be unconscionable when they require plaintiffs to arbitrate low-value lawsuits on an individual basis. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:06 pm by Simon Gibbs
What might be considered exceptional in a low value matter may not be exceptional in a substantial piece of litigation. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:04 am
A recent edition of Nucleonics Week [pdf], a leading source of news for the commercial nuclear power business, contains a detailed report on the Supreme Court's recent antidumping decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:45 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 794 (08 July 2011) Hossack, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWCA Civ 788 (08 July 2011) Lowe & Anor v W Machell Joinery Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 798 (08 July 2011) Relational LLC v Hodges [2011] EWCA Civ 774 (07 July 2011) Fox v Foundation Piling Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 790 (07 July 2011) MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793… [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:01 pm
False advertising claims, between competing peddlers of the magnetic toy blocks, went out on summary judgment in PlastWood v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
An editorial from today's Globe and Mail states: "The legacy of slavery and segregation continues to dominate American civic life. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Jessica Arons
Vermont and Rhode Island also acted to ensure that the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy will remain protected in their states, regardless of what the Supreme Court might do to Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 10:30 am by David Han
A few terms back, in United States v. [read post]