Search for: "State v. Lujan" Results 181 - 200 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Significantly, the Court was careful to note that pleading the requisite degree of “injury” for purposes of Prop 64 standing is not onerous:We also relied on the United States Supreme Court's description of "injury in fact" for federal court standing purposes as " 'an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized . . . and (b) "actual or imminent, not 'conjectural' or 'hypothetical,' "… [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:34 am by Moseley Collins
As Church's claim is a state law claim for retaliation, the California Court of Appeal decision in Mamou v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:34 am by Moseley Collins
As Church's claim is a state law claim for retaliation, the California Court of Appeal decision in Mamou v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:12 pm by Lawrence Solum
Part II shifts focus to the Court’s specifically environmental standing decisions in the 20th century, emphasizing the importance of its 1992 decision in Lujan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]