Search for: "State v. Lujan" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
United States of America (C.D.Cal. filed Mar. 9, 2009) on the motion of the California Attorney General, and has done so on narrow, procedural grounds, without reaching the merits of the due process and equal-protection claims:As Plaintiffs' marriage is valid within California, they cannot present an injury with respect to the recognition of their marriage by the State of California under Lujan [v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Michael Froomkin
The issue for me goes back to a key standing decision, Lujan v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 6:19 am by Calvin Massey
Jonathan Adler, at the Volokh Conspiracy, thinks that Mass v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
EPA "recalls the previous high-water mark of diluted standing requirements, United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm by Unknown
Hansen (Religious Freedom; Free Exercise Clause) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlScudero v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 1:16 am
" Id. at 122.To establish standing, CREW claims to have suffered the requisite injury in fact, see Lujan v. [read post]