Search for: "State v. Lyon" Results 181 - 200 of 492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2014, 11:47 am
Courts recognize this, for instance holding that use of trademarks in parodies is generally unlikely to cause confusion; see, for instance, Lyons Partnership v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
That to me indicates a state of mind right there that is questionable. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:30 am by Gilles Cuniberti
Celine Camara, Doctoral candidate, Researcher at the Max-Planck Institute, Discrimination against Third State Nationals in Regulation 2201/2003 “Brussels II bis”. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Justin Neighbors, No. 105,588 (Lyon)State appeal (petition for review)Stephen J. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
She stated that during the initial visual comparison, the judge may disregard similarities on the basis that they are "too commonplace, unoriginal or consist of general ideas", before undertaking a detailed analysis of the works. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:16 am by Carl Folsom
  Even though the case seemed a clear example of defense of another, the COA initially denied his claim, stating that it was controlled by the then-recent opinion in State v. [read post]