Search for: "State v. Madden" Results 181 - 200 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2009, 7:52 pm by Matthew Nied
The decision of Justice Madden of the New York State Supreme Court in the infamous Cohen v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 Plaintiffs claim must fail because New York courts do not recognize a claim for breach of attorney-client privilege for a third person’s intrusion into the communication between the attorney and the client (see Madden v Creative Servs., Inc., 84 NY2d 738, 744 [1995]). [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Anyway, here are what I consider Perry's worst criminal-justice related vetoes:Maximizing police arrest powersPhoto via The EconomistSB 730 (2001): After the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 5:08 am by Schachtman
Stuart Madden, Exploring Tort Law 52 (2005). [read post]
However, the Second Circuit cast doubt on the “valid-when-made” doctrine when it ruled in its 2015 decision in Madden v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:32 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky and James Kim
  To our knowledge, no state has ever subjected small business loans to the same regulations as consumer loans. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
.' Hernandez v Marquez   2012 NY Slip Op 31112(U)   April 20, 2012   Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 103531/11  Judge: Joan A. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:44 am
California and the "Delaware Carve-Out" Keith Bishop reports on this development: A few weeks ago, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals - in Madden v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Electronic Arts’s “Madden NFL 10″ for Sony PlayStation 2 is displayed at a Best Buy in Mountain View, Calif., Wednesday, July 7, 2010. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
This still seems like a dangerous state of affairs, where a studio is required to obtain a release from every single person who appears in footage or risk a copyright claim and worst yet an injunction requiring the entire film to be put on hold. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am by thelawprofessor
Moustakis v Christie’s, Inc. 2009 NY Slip Op 09543 Decided on December 22, 2009 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]