Search for: "State v. Madden" Results 201 - 220 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  In R v Legal Aid Board, ex p Kaim Todner ([1999] QB 966), the Court stated that it was important not to forget why proceedings need to be held under the full glare of a public hearing because there was a natural tendency for the general principle to be eroded. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 12:00 am
It originates from the rights of privacy afforded under the United States Constitution, but surprisingly, there is no federal right per se. [3]  [4] Rather, forty states recognize either a statutory or common law right of publicity, and fourteen extend its reach beyond a person’s death. [5] As a result, California’s right of publicity laws are different from New York, etc., which means that a lawsuit’s outcome is highly dependent on the state law… [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:02 am
The Gridiron Battle In 2009, legendary Cleveland Browns football player Jim Brown sued Electronic Arts and Sony, claiming they had violated the Lanham Act by including his image and stats in EA’s Madden Football series. [25] EA had licensed current NFL players through the NFL Players Association, but as an NLF retiree, Brown was not included. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 2:53 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Just before his ouster, Danon filed a whistleblower action, State of New York ex rel David Danon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
And other states have other tests. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
Now drinkers can enjoy the IPKat's football prowess via Greek decoders Breathlessly back on the blog after this morning's envigorating copyright and trade mark law training session with a bright and bushy-tailed batch of trainees, this Kat now turns to the main news of the moment, today's momentous ruling of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm… [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 3:33 pm by Richard Hunt
The court declined to retain jurisdiction of state law claims and dismissed the case, though without prejudice to a state court filing of the state law claims. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:34 pm by Ted Brooks
Note that this button indicates the current state: not what will happen when you tap it. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by Steve McConnell
Parisian stated that "I'm here not as … the expert in Aredia and Zometa. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:55 am by Mark Methenitis
The Lanham Act arose in the gamespace during 2009’s James “Jim" Brown v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 3:23 am by Michael Lowe
  It is true they are no longer mandatory, but discretionary pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am by SHG
’” Braley, 832 F.2d at 1512 (quoting McCandless v. [read post]