Search for: "State v. Maes" Results 1 - 20 of 271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 3:48 pm
  As the courtroom saga unfolds, M&A players and practitioners should keep a watchful eye – not since In re IBP Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 3:28 am by John Jascob
The SEC stated at the time that it had agreed to not prosecute Fannie Mae after considering the GSE’s unique circumstances, including the financial support provided to the company by the Treasury, the role of the FHFA as conservator, and the potential costs to U.S. taxpayers.The case is No. 11-CV-9202-PAC. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
That charter authorizes Fannie Mae to sue and be sued “in any court of competent jurisdiction, State or Federal. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:33 am by Ronald Mann
The earliest cases involved entities like the Bank of the United States; the most recent one is a 1992 decision, American National Red Cross v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm by nflatow
By Mae Kuykendall, Professor of Law, Michigan State University, and Director of the Legal E-Marriage Project A federal court in Manhattan has entered a summary judgment in favor of Edith Windsor, a widow assessed an estate tax of $363,053 on her spousal inheritance. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:21 am by Ben Vernia
(They had alleged that Fannie Mae had falsely claimed to be a governmental agency that was immune from state taxation.) [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:46 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Jury deliberations — Review of evidence Rosie Mae Garnett, appellant, was charged in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County with 32 counts relating to the illegal procurement, possession, and distribution of prescription narcotics. [read post]
18 May 2015, 12:44 pm by Media Law Prof
Mae Kuykendall, Michigan State University College of Law, is publishing Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence in volume 42 of the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly (2015). [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:44 am by Andrew Hamm
Tackett (13-1010) and called for the views of the Solicitor General in Fannie Mae v. [read post]