Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 1 - 20 of 3,522
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
State government policy makers not covered by Age Discrimination in Employment Act [ADEA]Source: Findlaw.Com Weekly Labor & Employment Law Newsletter, December 27-31, 2010Opp v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
Policy-maker's terminated after spouse sues State alleges violation of a Constitutional right to associate with others in intimate relationshipsAdler v Pataki, 2nd Circ., 185 F.3d 35Although the Second Circuit U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:56 am by sally
Collins v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1193; [2013] WLR (D) 376 “Where a planning decision engaged a child’s right to private and family life that child’s best interests would be a primary consideration for the decision-maker. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:12 am
R (Al-Sweady and others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2387 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 292 “In any judicial review proceedings relating to a case which involved crucial, ‘hard-edged’ questions of fact in light of which it was necessary for the court to allow cross-examination of makers of witness statements on those [...] [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:07 am by sally
IA (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening) [2014] UKSC 6; [2014] WLR (D) 36 ‘National decision-makers had an independent and autonomous responsibility under the Convention and Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) (Cmd 9171) and (1967) (Cmnd 3906) to determine the applications of those who had applied for asylum. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:52 am
Regina (Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence (No 2) Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Full disclosure was required in any judicial review proceedings involving disputed questions of fact so that effective and proper cross-examination of the makers of witness statements on those questions could take place. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:34 pm by Lead Counsel
The plaintiffs' bar won two decisions in Washington state on whether equipment makers must warn about asbestos containing components used with their equipment or on their equipment even if they did not make the asbestos containing components.BRAATEN v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by melissalafreniere
The SD Tribes’ Opioid Epidemic Lawsuit is Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
— Carl V Phillips (@carlvphillips) July 24, 2017 Woo Hoo! [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:54 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last week, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:06 am by sally
Regina (Nour) v Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWHC 2543 (Admin); [2015] WLR (D) 392 ‘An assessment made by the Secretary of State for Defence under the Government’s Overseas Security and Justice Assistance Guidance was justiciable and subject to the courts’ power of review, save with regard to the assessment of political or reputational risk involved in such assistance. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am by Christine Corcos
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:23 am
Assistant Attorneys General ruled “policy makers” for the purposes of the First Amendment, Title VII and the ADEA Butler v NYS Dept. of Law, CA2, [Appeal from summary judgment in favor of the State, see Butler v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 2:08 am
AH and Others (Sudan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “In determining whether it would be unduly harsh to expect an asylum seeker to relocate to a safe haven in another part of his country, there was no requirement that consideration of conditions in the place of habitual residence had to be the starting point of the assessment. [read post]