Search for: "State v. Maki" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 10:41 am by Liisa Speaker
King; Michigan Lawyers Weekly July 3, 2017 Issue No. 07-94926, 6 pagesAll factors need not be stated on the recordConsideration of every factor need not be stated on the record; however, before permitting a change in a minor child’s legal residence, the court shall consider each of the factors set forth under MCL 722.31(4), with the child as the primary focus in the court’s deliberations, held the Michigan Court of Appeals in a published opinion.Yachcik v.… [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:13 am
" Chirlin did not reach the broader state constitutional issue that Lisa Maki, Gerritsen's attorney, had raised - whether, under Admin. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am by Public Employment Law Press
"One cannot be held liable under a contract to which he or she is not a party" (Victory State Bank v EMBA Hylan, LLC, 169 AD3d 963, 965; see Maki v Travelers Cos., Inc., 145 AD3d 1228, 1230; 1911 Richmond Ave. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:30 am by Eric
Christopher Maki runs Sellify, which in turn runs a website/eBay store called OneQuality.com. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am by Chidera Anyanwu
The United States also has unsuccessfully attempted copyright reform to protect fashion designs, and the debate about the adequacy of its current copyright protections continues.[12] The United States Supreme Court’s holding in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]