Search for: "State v. Mandel"
Results 61 - 80
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am
At the ACS Blog, Jeffrey Mandell discusses an amicus brief filed on behalf of the District of Columbia by the state of Wisconsin, joined by 23 other states, that “attempts to constitutionalize the dispute, with broad implications. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
” Judge Chuang also cited Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:45 am
Gibbons v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am
Q: Greg Mandel’s empirical work suggests people view IP as an attribution law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
” In Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
” Indeed, as the court stated in 2010 in Holder v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Mandel, has argued for this approach.But that is not the only possible basis for distinguishing persons with connections to the United States from persons lacking such connections. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm
At that point, the stated justification for the travel ban vanishes. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Mandel v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
In Hamdan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
Mandel and Kerry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Mandel and its own decision in Cardenas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:07 am
Under Kerry v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Next, while acknowledging that the Court has allowed limited judicial review where an immigration policy allegedly violates a U.S. citizen’s constitutional rights (per Mandel and Kerry v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” In Mandel, the Court recognized that aliens outside the United States could not bring constitutional challenges, such as asserting a First Amendment right to communicate with Americans. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
