Search for: "State v. Mandel" Results 101 - 120 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
Mandel (1972) and recently applied by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in 2015’s Kerry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was not until 2017—more than two decades after United States v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:34 pm
Patently-O has a May 2 post entitled: KSR v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In Hamoudeh v Mandel ;2009 NY Slip Op 04195 ;decided on May 26, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see the effect of plaintiff stating in a deposition [likely in the underlying action] that  he did not see what caused him to fall. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
In a sea of reports on the state of the (large firm) legal industry, it’s nice to see recognition of their particular issues in Thomson Reuters’ State of US Small Law Firms Survey. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Marty Lederman
  (The implication of the Mandel case itself, for example, was that if the government had in fact denied Mandel a visa in order to prevent U.S. audiences from hearing what he had to say, that would not have been a “legitimate” ground, i.e., it would have been unconstitutional.) [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
It is therefore unclear whether advocacy demonstrating reasons for other outcomes is a successful strategy for debiasing.Greg Mandel (Professor, Temple University Law School, USA) summarized his original research on hindsight bias in patent law.[7]Mandel found, in an experimental study with mock jurors, a strong effect of hindsight bias. [read post]