Search for: "State v. Mandel"
Results 161 - 180
of 196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
(13, 15-16) Mandel relied on an old Second Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
In Tseng v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
It has been nearly a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Morrision v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:36 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d at 949). [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:37 am
" The standard under Franks v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
The argument in Marbury v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 1:22 am
Leave to amend the pleadings is freely granted, absent prejudice (see Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser, P.C. v E.I. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
” Lopez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:52 am
See also Mandel v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:55 am
See Mandell v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:52 am
What Rumpole doesn't tell you is that Scalia also dissented in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:58 am
See Mandell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
See Mandell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 8:55 am
However, affording the legal malpractice cause of action a liberal construction and according the plaintiff every favorable inference, the complaint does state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see generally Hamoudeh v Mandel, 62 AD3d 948, 949; Maiolini v McAdams & Fallon, P.C., 61 AD3d 644, 645; Malik v Beal, 54 AD3d 910, 911). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
Under title 15 of the United States Code, it is unlawful for a person to engage in short selling that is “in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:31 am
Given these allegations, the stipulation may constitute evidence of defendants' negligence and does not constitute a defense to the malpractice claim (see Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser, P.C. v E.I. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser, P.C. v E.I. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
In Hamoudeh v Mandel ;2009 NY Slip Op 04195 ;decided on May 26, 2009 ; Appellate Division, Second Department we see the effect of plaintiff stating in a deposition [likely in the underlying action] that he did not see what caused him to fall. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
In Nicaragua v. [read post]
