Search for: "State v. Manning" Results 1 - 20 of 15,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
Allegation: White man complains that a Black woman coworker at their Missouri state agency repeatedly hits on him, including with the proposition that it's "not cheating if it's not in your race. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet  165   Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181   America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty  193    Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
” At its core, Weinstein’s case simply applied the long-established rules of the more than century-old case of People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:01 pm by Kevin
The man who wrote the screenplay for the 1989 film Road House, starring Patrick Swayze as a man who lives like a loner, fights like a professional, and loves like there’s no tomorrow, and for some reason chooses to do all that in Jasper, Missouri, has sued those behind the 2024 remake. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Before the jury, Kilburn stated that he was familiar with Mosley’s 'build,' 'body language,' 'body type,' and the 'shape of his nose.'" Admitting this testimony was not harmless error, as it probably convinced the jury that Moseley was the man in the video. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Harvie Wilkinson: A woman sued a man for sexually assaulting her and used a pseudonym throughout discovery. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]